IMHO, i think most of them are firefighters and auditors while only a handful of them are genuinely interested in developing themselves to become a well-respected leader. How to measure and quantify the success of a leader? is it proven by the number of followers who had successfully developed themselves to the next level? the number of patents? the amount of influence he/she has in critical decision making process?
Although many would agree that all leaders can be a manager but not all managers can be a leader, interestingly, someone disagreed with me that not all leaders can be manager especially technical leaders. However, this was only a personal thought and it wasn't empirically supported.
Here's an article published by McKinsey Quarterly on the role of frontline managers.....
Are they…
players, performing assigned tasks themselves, and gaining additional leverage from those they supervise?
firefighters, who perform assigned tasks, identify and fix problems, and successfully confront unexpected everyday challenges or crises as they arise (e.g., handling irate customers, addressing production problems, identifying and eliminating defects)?
auditors, assigning and overseeing the completion of work by others, directly observing the conduct of direct reports, checking the speed and quality of their work, and intervening as necessary to maintain acceptable performance levels?
or are they
true leaders, who spend most of their time directing and managing others, with an emphasis on motivating, coaching, and developing their direct reports?**********************************************************
Our experience suggests that a front line that’s too focused on executing assigned tasks can have insidious long-term effects. Such preoccupation leaves no time for efforts to deal with new demands (say, higher production or quality), let alone for looking at the big picture. The result is a working environment with little flexibility, little encouragement to make improvements, and an increased risk of low morale among both workers and their managers—all at high cost to companies.We’ve also found that remarkable performance improvement is possible for companies that help their frontline managers to become true leaders, and that successful approaches can be applied across many industries. A mining company that implemented such a program, for instance, enjoyed a 10 percent increase in tonnage per frontline employee. A bank branch found that cross-selling went up by 24 percent within a year. Total sales at a department store rose 2 percent in one six-month period.To unlock a team’s abilities, managers at any level must spend a significant amount of time on two activities: helping the team understand the company’s direction and its implications for team members and coaching for performance. Little of either occurs on the front line today.Across industries, frontline managers spend 30 to 60 percent of their time on administrative work and meetings, and 10 to 50 percent on nonmanagerial tasks (traveling, participating in training, taking breaks, conducting special projects, or undertaking direct customer service or sales themselves). They spend only 10 to 40 percent actually managing frontline employees by, for example, coaching them directly.
In contrast, the frontline managers at best-practice companies allocate 60 to 70 percent of their time to the floor, much of it in high-quality individual coaching. Such companies also empower their managers to make decisions and act on opportunities. The bottom-line benefit is significant, but to obtain it companies must fundamentally redefine what they expect from frontline managers and redesign the work that those managers and their subordinates do.